Elearning Planning and Management

As part of the graduate course I am taking on Planning and Management in Distance Education and Training I am reading Marc Rosenberg's book on Elearning Strategies for Delivering Knowledge in the Digital Age. In the first few chapters there were two critical points which spoke to me. First, that technology in and of itself will not enhance learning. The case that illustrates that point well, was the adoption of cable TV in the classroom. As a tool, technology has the potential to enhance learning if it is accompanied by the appropriate instructional strategies which are designed to achieve the learning outcome. I am inclined to endorse Elliot Masie's position that the technological implementation is the easy part of the equation and that the most challenging aspect is developing the new models of interaction that will allow us to truly realize the full potential of elearning.

Rosenberg also contends that "without a comprehensive strategic foundation" elearning implementations are prone to failure. I have seen many elearning projects that were not sustainable because the decision-makers did not set out realistic, long-term objectives that were achievable given the environment they were operating in. That's why over the next few months I will be working with our Dept. of Health Policy Management to develop a comprehensive, multi-year strategic plan for their Online Master of Health Sciences in Health Administration program. The plan will include the costing structure and operational requirements for their program as well as evaluation and performance indicators and methodologies. We are hoping this process will become a template for other programs on campus wishing to adopt similar delivery strategies. Stay tuned on this front, as I will post the materials regarding this plan at this site.

So far the book is a good read, but I do take issue with some of the items Rosenberg lists in his "Benefits of Elearning". Keep in mind that he is coming from a corporate training perspective.

1) "Despite outward appearances elearning is often the most cost-effective way to deliver instruction (training) or information."

From a University perspective this is not necessarily the case. While it may reduce the need for classroom/ instructor infrastructure, the following items can dramatically increase the cost of course development and delivery; software license, hardware, maintenance of course and hardware, expertise (technical/ instructional design), opportunity cost of faculty time (subject matter expert), copyright, multimedia production. There is a potential to become cost effective, but only once the initial startup costs are absorbed and the number of students increase beyond a certain point.

2) Universality. "Concern over differences in platforms and operating systems is rapidly fading".

The increasingly proprietary nature of learning management systems and content is a major barrier to the concept of universality. The consulting fees required to enable the type of exchange to occur between different hardware and software systems is prohibitive. Until open standards/ source are more widely adopted we will not be able to easily exchange information between systems and individuals.

3) Scalability. "Programs can move from 10 participants to 100 or even 100,000 participants with little effort or incremental cost (as long as the infrastructure is in place)."

That last part is the key. Few Universities or colleges have the resources to put the infrastructure in place for such a dramatic increase in participants.

Take our costs for example. We are a small unit supporting about 2500 users.

Software (LMS/ OS) $60, 000
Hardware $50, 000

To increase our capacity beyond 6 000 users would require $150, 000!

I firmly believe that institutions need to employ a costing methodology that reflects the true cost of adopting elearning delivery strategies. Bates's presentation, "The impact of e-learning on the university campus: measuring the costs and benefits"" (windows media version) is an excellent reference. Link for alternate formats (search for Tony Bates).

Comments

[portal web]

Portal web
Enlaces web
inmobiliaria
free links exchange
Manga
foros
chat con foto
clasificados
sexo virtual
beijing 2008
pekin 2008
referencement
liens en dur
ayuda web

[kooyiom]

The UK National Lottery is played by millions of people up and down the country every week, and many of those people either play more than one set of numbers, or they are part of a syndicate with their friends or co-workers. If this sounds like you, read on.

http://gente.chueca.com/world-lotto/lottery.html>lottery results

[mahcyg]

hello dear webmaster theese are my projects!
http://viva.blog-city.com/granny_free_sex_strories_videos.htm >granny free sex strories videos [url=http://viva.blog-city.com/granny_free_sex_strories_videos.htm ]granny free sex strories videos[/url] http://viva.blog-city.com/xxx_free_cumshot_movies.htm > [url=http://viva.blog-city.com/xxx_free_cumshot_movies.htm ][/url] http://viva.blog-city.com/free_xxxx_movies.htm >free tranny sex movies [url=http://viva.blog-city.com/free_xxxx_movies.htm ]free tranny sex movies[/url] http://viva.blog-city.com/free_tranny_sex_movies.htm > [url=http://viva.blog-city.com/free_tranny_sex_movies.htm ][/url] http://viva.blog-city.com/free_full_toon_sex_movies.htm >lesbian xxx free movies [url=http://viva.blog-city.com/free_full_toon_sex_movies.htm ]lesbian xxx free movies[/url] http://viva.blog-city.com/free_black_gay_porn_movies.htm >hot college sex movies [url=http://viva.blog-city.com/free_black_gay_porn_movies.htm ]hot college sex movies[/url] http://viva.blog-city.com/lesbian_xxx_free_movies.htm >hot college sex movies [url=http://viva.blog-city.com/lesbian_xxx_free_movies.htm ]hot college sex movies[/url] http://viva.blog-city.com/hot_college_sex_movies.htm > [url=http://viva.blog-city.com/hot_college_sex_movies.htm ][/url] http://viva.blog-city.com/top_rated_gay_porn_movies.htm >top rated hardcore porn movies [url=http://viva.blog-city.com/top_rated_gay_porn_movies.htm ]top rated hardcore porn movies[/url] http://viva.blog-city.com/buy_xxx_adult_movies.htm >buy xxx adult movies [url=http://viva.blog-city.com/buy_xxx_adult_movies.htm ]buy xxx adult movies[/url]

[Rupen]

There are some open source LMSes out there, Moodle and ATutor. For smaller institutions and organizations, these LMSes do provide sufficient features and are a viable option. Hence the money being used in technology can quite easily be used in developing effective eLearning courses.

[Rupen]

There are some open source LMSes out there, Moodle and ATutor. For smaller institutions and organizations, these LMSes do provide sufficient features and are a viable option. Hence the money being used in technology can quite easily be used in developing effective eLearning courses.

[none]

I really enjoyed what you had to say about elearning-it is up to the instructors to implement it. Technology itself will not enhance student learning. I really enjoyed seeing both sides of the spectrum (corporate and educators).

[lphill]

The article on Marc Rosenberg's book presented topics that have been discussed by educators. The comment that technology in and of itself will not enhance learning certainly applies to younger grades. Too many times students are thrown into a technology activity just to say students are on the computer. There really is no instructional strategy involved. Students do not make a connection.